If people acted differently, then institutions would change.
Rhetoric of the institution is not the actions in total of the institution. Rhetoric is a body itself, or a philosophy where bodies are disorganized.
Representatives either act in the name of, draw sustenance from a group of, or otherwise relate to non-present individuals.
What purposes do these individuals see in their representatives? What power do they hold over them? Can they remove their power?
That one is fully "up periscope" for me, dude.
ReplyDeleteRight over my head.